I was influenced by the grading scale used by a blog by Martina Bex on assessment and grading. I really love her reasoning and concepts! However, as a colleague pointed out, a grading system like this won’t fly in my district because her have a strong emphasis on the unit test. All grading systems must have a high stakes test grade. I hashed it out with my colleague, crunching numbers (which was pretty funny – there’s a reason neither of us teach math). We came up with this as possible categories for Spanish IV next year:
- Writing 20%
- Speaking 20%
- Listening 15%
- Reading 15%
- Cumulative assessment 20%
- Work ethics 10%
I’ll check this with her and make sure I remember it correctly. I know we wanted to place more emphasis on output than input (writing/speaking as output). I also know that I wanted to emphasize that, although we have a “high stakes test”, it is not as important as actual demonstrated proficiency. Work ethics would include participation and homework.
UPDATE: I still have to include a quiz grade as well for my Spanish II classes so their categories/weights will be:
- Quiz 20%
- Test 20%
- Work ethics 10%
- Proficiency:
- Writing 15%
- Speaking 15%
- Listening 10%
- Reading 10%
Ugh! I can’t believe that you must include a high stakes test grade and the quiz grade! It seems like that is moving backward, not forward! I love how you’ve adapted the system to work with your requirements 🙂